0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
500 $
AUGUST 2025 يوم متبقٍ

Royal Mail Uses US Troops Photo To Showcase ‘British Involvement’ In D-Day Landings

Support SouthFront

On December 27th, the British Royal Mail revealed its 2019 Special Stamp calendar. It showcases the “Best of British” programme, among other things commemorating the 75th anniversary of the D-Day landings.

The D-Day commemoration stamp in question is the following one:

Royal Mail Uses US Troops Photo To Showcase 'British Involvement' In D-Day Landings

The issue with the photograph is that it actually shows the “USS LCI(L)-30 landing troops carrying stretchers onto a beach during a second assault wave. US Coast Guard photo for ‘All Hands’ magazine, July 1944 issue (page 29). Similar to 2000.325.043. ‘2191-B-17.’ ‘U.S. Coast Guard Official Picture, 3rd Naval District.’ Sarmi, Dutch New Guinea, 17 May 1944.”

Essentially, the Royal Mail’s designers didn’t do their due diligence and presented US landing troops on the shores of Indonesia instead of British troops on D-Day.

On the following day, the Royal Mail apologized and said that the stamp would not be part of the final collection: “We work very hard to ensure that our Special Stamp programme appropriately commemorates anniversaries and events that are relevant to UK heritage and life. We would like to offer our sincere apologies that our preview release for our 2019 Special Stamp programme included a stamp design which had been incorrectly associated with the D-day landings.”

As it usually happens with such blunders posted on social media, users mocked the “commemorative stamp.”

Tory councilor Robert Barnard, on Twitter called for disciplinary action against the person signed the stamp off.

There were also alternative designs suggested by Twitter users:

Some of the other stamps included the UK’s birds of prey, as well as Queen Victoria and Prince Albert.

Other Twitter users also took part in some banter claiming that it is not Queen Victoria on the stamp (it actually is):

While some former employees appeared to not even be surprised by the blunder:

More recently, an Iraqi-Iran war commemorative poster in Iran’s Shiraz showed soldiers from Israel’s Defense Forces. It wouldn’t be such a massive issue if Israel wasn’t basically Iran’s mortal nemesis.

The Mossad’s post actually makes a fair point, since they showed Israeli soldiers, but removed the woman from the photograph.

Earlier than that, the US Postal Service in 2011 issue a stamp showing the Statue of Liberty. It was not the one on Liberty Island, New York, however, but a replica from a Las Vegas casino.

The photo used on the stamp shows a rectangular patch on the crown that is present on the 14-year-old statue at the New York-New York Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada, but not on the (93m) copper statue in New York. In addition, the facial features on the Las Vegas replica are more sharply defined than on the original.

Mistakes like these are actually somewhat common since “modern” designers have limited or no knowledge of history and appear to be allergic to doing their due diligence.

Support SouthFront

SouthFront

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
14
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x